Politicians have a strange DNA strand that
allows them, almost at will, to insert their foot in their mouths … and still
keep on talking.
It’s too easy, too simplistic, to say that
Texas Gov. Ricky Perry is dumb. He is not dumb; he is a graduate of Texas
A&M, and all joking aside, that is one fine educational institution. He was
an Air Force pilot that the fact that he’s still alive attests to having some degree
of smarts. He was an Eagle Scout and that is not an easy task. He was a
cheerleader in college … and I’ll let that great opportunity to a stinging, yet
thoughtful, jibe just slide on by.
A former cotton farmer and former Democrat,
Perry proved he’s not dumb by making a living from working in the dirt and
getting elected three times to the Texas House of Representatives. In 1988 he
chaired the president campaign in Texas for Al Gore, and the next year he
switched to the Republican Party.
After running for and being elected state
agriculture commissioner and lieutenant governor, he was pushed into the
governor’s office when George W. Bush was elected president. Perry has won
three terms as governor since 2000.
I first met Perry when he was Ag
Commissioner and he was on a vote-me-in march through East Texas. I remember
thinking: Good hair, great teeth, strong handshake … yep, he’ll do just fine as
a Texas politician
He, as has every politician at one time or
another, performed stupid politician tricks in his years in office. Perry’s
claim to Intellectual Hell will forever be hinged on his executive decisions
that severely harmed the state education system. (Just talk to practically any Texas teacher; they all have Perry stories.) But, as an example, when
he ran for president in 2011 and 2012, one of his campaign promises was to shut
down the U.S. Department of Education.)
Texas ranks in the Bottom 10 in per student
expenditures in education (at No. 9 in 2013 with a “bullet”) and Perry seems
proud of that fact.
He is a Pisces and shares this distinction
with Alexander Graham Bell, George Washington, Chaz Bono, Sam Houston, Tammy
Faye Bakker Messner, Antonio de Lopez Santa Ana and Osama bin Laden. The single
most recognizable trait that all of these folks, and Perry, share is extreme decisiveness.
Being “decisive” does not always compute
into “being right.” Perry’s record on “being right” has more to do with his
perception of how the winds of public opinion are blowing at any particular
point in time.
His penchant for cutting funding to public
education in Texas is beyond reasonable and measured explanation. While Perry
is crowing about how well Texas is doing on the economic front and how much the
state has in its surplus account, the state has dropped to more than $3,000 per
student below the national average. (To make it clear: Arkansas and Louisiana
spends more per student on education that does Texas. The only states that
spend less than Texas per student are Utah, Idaho, Oklahoma, Arizona,
Mississippi, Tennessee, North Carolina and Nevada.)
Added to that stat, Texas ranks 38th
in average teacher salaries, down four spots from 2012.
While the governor claims that “the idea
his decisions about education are doing long-term damage to public education
funding is just not true.” Last year Texas high school students matched their
lowest average scores on the college entrance exam in the past decade; average
scores dropped in math, reading and writing.
He, like others of his party, refuses to
acknowledge that the demographics of his constituency are changing at a blazing
pace. California and New Mexico now have a higher Hispanic population than
white; Texas is projected to join that group no later than 2020.
As became evident in the 2012 presidential
election, ignoring and/or demeaning huge voting blocs will not fly outside of a
regional or state political race. Whatever Perry’s future political ambitions
may be – and if his disastrous 2012 presidential bid is any indication, that’s all
he has … ambitions – he has to begin rethinking and retinkering with his
political philosophy.
A good place to start would be in the area
of education. In this area he has worked hard to earn a rousing, romping F. The
sad part is the man seems proud of that grade.
Which leads us back to the original
thought: Can he really be that “dumb”?
No comments:
Post a Comment